Monday, 12 October 2015
OUGD501 Study Task 2 | Parody and Pastiche
Write a definition of parody/pastiche based on these two documents using at least one quote from each author.
Parody and pastiche are similar in the fact they both mean that somebody is using another's work for some sort of use in their own; it is how they are used that separates the two.
Parody is more negative than pastiche as it often has 'ulterior motives', such as to mock or discredit. Although parody may not always be malicious, it is not the same as using other's work to inspire your own work and style which is the case with pastiche.
Sunday, 11 October 2015
OUGD501 Study Task 1 | The Death of the Author
In ‘Death of the Author’, Barthes explains ‘believing’ in the authors hinders the reader of being able to create their own views on the written text as they are constantly trying to figure out as to why the author has written it. Barthes describes this as the ‘sway of the author’.
Barthes also believes that it us bit the words and the reader that matter, not where or who they came from or what the author meant by them. This is what is meant by ‘a text’s unity lies not in its origin, but its destination’; the ‘origin’ being the author and the ‘destination’ being the reader.
Thought the text, when referencing to an author he calls them ‘The Author’. This title, which includes capitalised letters, suggests these people are fictional or all one and the same, or should at least be perceived that way in the minds of the readers. This idea is backed up by the way Barthes says: ‘The Author, when believed in…’. This line, along with the phrase ‘Author God’ eludes to the fact that he feels people need to ‘distance’ themselves from the person who wrote the text as they are viewed as an all mighty power who’s views and ideologies are correct.
As said earlier, he feels this needs to be done because ‘to give a text an author is to impose a limit on that text’. This ‘limit’ is created by the reader analysing the words that come from the author’s thought, rather than just analysing the text for themselves. By trying to work out what the author means, the reader then takes that meaning and attaches it to those words rather than taking in the text and creating and discovering their own meaning. This can be linked to Barthes’ idea that nothing has meaning until somebody gives it a meaning. If the reader goes into a piece of text with the mind-set that there is already a set meaning behind the words or a definitive right and wrong way to interpret them, then they’ll miss out on letting the writing really be able to relate to them.
This can be related to graphic design as the 'author' described by Barthes could be seen as the same as a designer of a piece of graphic design. In 'the design process' it is often thought that nothing is worth doing if it doesn't have a reason behind it, these are informed decisions. If a person viewing the final piece is looking at it and is focusing on figuring out each stage of the the designer's thought process, they will not fully experience the work and be able to take it it for themselves.
Tuesday, 5 May 2015
OUGD401 | Module Evaluation
Overall I didn't find this module too bad. I think out of all the modules I have completed this year I have managed Context of Practice the best, time management wise. I think this is due to the fact that we had to submit a draft before we submitted the module, this allowed me to get most of the work done and then only have to fix up my errors and tweak aspects here and there.
I think the essay went well due to the fact I did well at english at GCSE and then also took it for A-Level, so I was used to writing academically, although there was a step up in the standard of writing that I had to get used to using. The element I did struggle with while doing the essay was finding and using a good amount of quotes for the points I was making.
For the practical I didn't find it too hard to come up with a range of ideas because the topic was already set due to the essay, and it worked well as the essay influenced my practical work which is how it was meant to be. I think my practical work turned out well as it is clear to make the link between the original Hope poster and my poster. The point of my poster is to get young people to vote and to be aware of the election, and I think if my poster were to be displayed round the college for example, it would catch the attention of viewers.
If I were to do this module again I would set out to start the practical earlier as I underestimated how long the poster took to make.
I think the essay went well due to the fact I did well at english at GCSE and then also took it for A-Level, so I was used to writing academically, although there was a step up in the standard of writing that I had to get used to using. The element I did struggle with while doing the essay was finding and using a good amount of quotes for the points I was making.
For the practical I didn't find it too hard to come up with a range of ideas because the topic was already set due to the essay, and it worked well as the essay influenced my practical work which is how it was meant to be. I think my practical work turned out well as it is clear to make the link between the original Hope poster and my poster. The point of my poster is to get young people to vote and to be aware of the election, and I think if my poster were to be displayed round the college for example, it would catch the attention of viewers.
If I were to do this module again I would set out to start the practical earlier as I underestimated how long the poster took to make.
OUGD401 | Final Essay
Discuss
the role that Graphic Design has played in political and/or social change in a
specific period in history.
A strong
political campaign has been proven to be a major factor in winning an election.
I intend to explore how and why this may be, focusing on the graphic design
behind it. My discussion will be focused on the events and design over the past
ten years.
Whether
it be big or small, graphic design and strong branding has become a fundamental
role in winning a campaign or even winning a war. From party logos to the
typeface used on campaign banners and from propaganda posters to union jack
badges, it is important to get these things right in order to help gain
support. When it comes to 'social change', it's hard to pin down exactly what
this means or what exactly would qualify for graphic design. Picket signs that
were made by protestors to be marched through the centre of town - are these
pieces of graphic design? Graffiti on the side of a fast food chain
commentating on the divide between rich and poor - is this graphic design? It
is thanks to these blurred outlines of what is and isn't graphic design that
can make this discussion so much more interesting as so many further topics can
be discussed. Due to this, I want to explore graphic design's role in political
and social change. I feel that the digital capabilities that have become
available have greatly improved how people are able view design and how easily
it can be shared. In addition to this, I also think some of the topics that
have hit the news in recent years and events that have occurred will cause for
an interesting discussion as the design response for some of them were
extremely important.
One
example of an extremely strong piece of political campaign design is Shepard
Fairey's 'Hope' poster, which went on to represent Obama's 2008 official
presidential campaign and is widely called a 'cultural phenomenon'. What
started off as a personal project of his, Fairey screen-printed and sold 350
posters with the image straight after designing. Rather than taking the money
for profit and stopping there, he used the money to produce more posters; selling
them, putting them up around the city and eventually distributing them at Obama
rallies once it became so iconic to Obama's campaign.
The
non-profit principal of designing and designing for a purpose is one of the
most effective and pure ways to design, especially when it comes to social or
political change. Fairey clearly supported Obama and his ideas but was
"naïve" about "Obama's popularity" (Fairey, 2011) as he
thought Obama would "get crushed by the Clinton juggernaut" and
therefor decided to use his own popularity within pop culture to give Obama
extra exposure, without damaging Obama's campaign due to "street artists
and radical types" (Fairey, 2011) trying to help him out. Although Fairey
is a street artist and a pop culture icon thanks to the huge success of his
work and 'Obey', he believed in what Obama said and felt passionately about
what he wanted to see happen; because of this he decided to help, to inform and
ultimately to persuade the general public. Fairey succeeded with his goals as the
image went viral extremely quickly soon after he made the image available on
his already popular website. The use of digital media here perfectly
demonstrates how modern technology can help get work seen by millions of
people. Fairey explained in an interview with Ben Arnon from 'The Huffington
Post' that he felt the image did so well because it was the perfect way for
Obama's followers to express their support in modern and symbolic way. Due to
it being accessible online, people were able to share the image extremely
easily, such as sharing it with their hundreds of Facebook friends or share it
on the then-popular site MySpace. The image was easily accessible for the
younger generation to relate to due to Fairey's previous work and his links to
the popular brand 'Obey', so this generation would have most likely already
seen this image on the internet before it went viral world wide. A study called
Generations Online from 2009 showed that thirty per cent of 18-32 year olds
were active online (it has probably increased over recent years). Not only was
it good for people to see online, but if people could print out their own copy
of the poster, it adds to the cause, people could stick it wherever they wanted
and still get more people to see it. The idea behind all of this was to keep
the image moving round and round and it worked very well.
The image
itself is a portrait of Barack Obama in a vector-style illustration with a red,
white and blue colour scheme, very fitting for an American presidential
campaign. The photograph the Fairey used as a reference point shows Obama
looking at a fixed point in the distance to the right. The illustration's use
of colour shows that half of his face is clearly highlighted, portraying that
he is someone of great importance and is extremely wise it is almost biblical
representation of a messiah. The other side of his face is cast in a deep
shadow, shown through the colour red. The background of the poster is split in
the same manner; blue on the left and red on the right. Along with these being
two of the American flag colours, blue and red often symbolise hot and cold,
peace and anger. In spite of this, Obama does not come across as an angry
person and Fairey did not/does not know him well enough to know what he is like
out of the public eye. In this case the red represents Obama's passion and love
for America. Whereas the blue represents Obama's calm side, his vision, his
thoughts and his caring nature. At the time of the election there was a lot of
excitement surrounding Obama's campaign as he had the chance to become
America's first black president. It is important to note that Fairey's work
doesn’t not show the colour of Obama's skin because it does not to as
this idea supports Obama's policies and beliefs that everyone is equal.
In the
first original first 300 posters the text at the bottom read 'Progress', but
that then got changed when the campaign's PR wanted to push the message of
'Hope' The typeface used for this and the rest of Obama's campaign was
'Gotham', a sans serif font with a geometric essence to it. This is a suitable
font as it was created in 2000 by Tobias Frere-Jones and took direct
inspiration from New York City's culture and surroundings. Aside from
Washington, New York could be called America's most important city due to the
organisations based there and along with other responsibilities it holds and
has been described as the cultural and financial capital of the world. So it
makes sense that the typeface used should originate in such a patriotic and important
city that has such strong links to design. Even after the campaign 'Gotham' got
used for various federal government projects, the most notable being the
identity of the 2010 United States Census. Another example is the cornerstone
for the Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center site which was described as the
then-Governor as the "bedrock" (Wikipedia, 2015) of New York. When
used directly in the poster it works well as it doesn’t interfere with the
portrait but is a clear part of the whole image and instantly recognisable;
it's clear, bold and as Andrew Romano of Newsweek put it: "it's very
American" (Wikipedia, 2015).
Overall
the image was widely popular and extremely successful. Fairey was able to
capture Barrack Obama perfectly in his illustration and it was done so well it
made people want to show others and share it and the poster has now ben
recognised as a cultural phenomenon. The online popularity of this poster
caused many parodies and copies supporting or showing many different people or things
to be made. In fact Shepard Fairey himself produced an adaption of the original
poster in 2011 to support the 'Occupy Movement'.
For the
poster 'Occupy Hope', Fairey replaced Barrack Obama with someone wearing a Guy
Fawkes mask. The mask is a stylised portrayal of supposedly Guy Fawkes that has
a wide smile, strong round cheeks with a moustache turned up at both ends
accompanied by a thin vertical beard. The mask was designed by illustrator
David Lloyd and was first seen on the front cover of the book 'V for Vendetta',
which was adapted into a film in 2006. Since then the mask has become an
international symbol for rebellion.
The
Occupy Movement protests against social and economic inequalities around the
world. All protests in the UK, America and many other countries have been
peaceful, although some countries have had to use violence to be heard, so much
so dictators have been overthrown. The Occupy Movement is getting more and more
support everyday and the slogan 'We Are The 99%' is therefore getting heard
more and more. This slogan is the focus point for all the movements campaign
and all of its 'propaganda'. The 99% refers to the poor, against the top 1% of
the rich. The slogan itself is very powerful. In five words it conveys power
and togetherness for millions of people globally. What started as a 'Tumblr'
post is now the slogan for an ever-growing international social movement.
Fairey's
'Occupy Hope' is the most notable piece of Graphic Design that supports the
Occupy Movement. As mentioned earlier, the poster has an image of a person
wearing a Guy Fawkes mask rather than Obama. The poster has the same
vector-style illustration and the same colour scheme as the original. This is
very effective due to the fact that the 'Hope' poster was/is so well recognised
so anything designed in that is going to grab the viewer's attention. In
addition to the mask, more text was added. At the bottom of the poster it reads
'Mister President, we hope you're on our side', using the original 'Hope' for
extra impact. Although the added text is smaller, it does not go unnoticed as
it is a red against a dark blue. Whereas Gotham was used for the original text,
the new text uses what looks to be a slab-serif typeface. This could be to draw
more attention to it or because it comes across bolder than a plain serif. By
using a slab-serif and talking directly to 'Mister President', it comes across
very powerful and meaningful without sounding too threatening. As well as the
text at the bottom, 'We are the 99%' was added to Obama's badge that sits above
the 'E'. Although this works as a great way to be able to get the slogan in the
poster without it looking out of place, it also implies that Obama is in fact
on 'their side', which he is not.
Although
this poster was liked among many and even those not interested or involved in
the Occupy Movement, some of the people who are actually involved were not 100%
happy with the design of it. A nameless organiser for The Occupy (Wall Street)
Movement said that the organisers "cannot in anyway be connected"
(Organiser, 2011) to the adaptation. The reasoning behind this is that it would
make them "hypocrites" (Organiser, 2011) as Obama has raised more
money from Wall Street than any other candidate in history. To correct the
situation the organiser mention earlier asked for Fairey to change a few
aspects of the poster in order for it to fit the movement's goals and
morals.
The
altered version doesn’t have any major alterations. The only thing Fairey
changed was the text that accompanied the iconic 'Hope' title. In the revisited
version it says 'We are the Hope', this was a direct request from the organiser
of the movement. They also requested for Fairey to add 'Expect us' underneath.
This is a reference to Anonymous and their famous slogan; 'We are Anonymous. We
are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.' This is
understandable as a "core subgroup within Anonymous played a significant
role" in the evolution of the movement. For some reason Fairey chose not to
include this despite the request, possible because it sounded too menacing for
a peaceful protest, or the poster has more impact without the unneeded
text.
The
process this poster went though in extraordinary and very unique to the time we
live in. The fact that an artist can create a piece of design to help a social
movement and then for the organisers to request changes and give reason to the
artist in order for it to be as strong as possible, all online is incredible.
This was so easy to do as the modern age allows for work to be seen all over
the world just hours after it has been created and for feedback to be given
just as quickly. In this case it worked extremely well because there was a
mutual respect between the two parties involved; Fairey supports The Occupy
Movement and the movement respects Fairey's work and what he is doing for them.
With no money involved it goes back to designing for a purpose, designing for
what you believe in.
The Guy
Fawkes mask that featured in the two versions of 'Occupy Hope' was first really
made popular by Anonymous. It started in 2008 when Anonymous protested against
the Church of Scientology and needed a way to hide their faces. As Anonymous is
an internet-based group, they were able to easily plan how to do so, then, as
more and more people began to protest for different things the mask became the
main way people hid their identities while also showing their support for the
group. It has now become associated with Anonymous so heavily that they base
all of their own propaganda around it. They often make videos explaining what
they are trying to achieve next. These videos open up with their logo; a
headless figure wearing a suit with a question mark where the head should be.
This clearly illustrates they do not want to be identified but also implies
that it could be anyone behind the mask. This is backed up by the origin of the
name 'Anonymous'. The name comes from a joke made by the users of '4Chan' a
popular image and forum website. On here, when someone makes a post but does
not want their name to be shown, it displays it as 'anonymous'. The joke was
that there was just one person with the username 'anonymous' and they were
making all of these posts. This then evolved to be the name of the group as it
conveys the message that Anonymous is anyone and everyone and you don’t need to
be seen to be heard. So with the suited, headless figure standing in front of a
globe surrounded by a laurel wreath, it's clear to see they believe they are
protecting the world. During the videos the person never shows their
face, it's always covered by a Guy Fawkes mask along with a voice changer so it
is impossible to identify who it is. All of this could be seen as graphic
design as it is all part of their 'brand'. It has helped make certain movements
more popular due to Anonymous' involvement and through their supporters.
From
looking in depth at the topic of graphic design in politics and social
movements, I have come to the conclusion that in order for a piece of design to
be effective, it has to grab the attention of the public. With Shepard Fairey’s
‘Hope’ poster, it gained a massive amount of attention because it was easy to
identify and the design was relatable due to it’s aesthetic. People wanted to
share it, people wanted to hang it up and be part of the movement that Fairey
created.
Overall
the aim of graphic design in social and political movements is to be worth
sharing and worth remembering as this gains votes and support. In the future I
think campaigns will only get stronger and wider as they’re able to reach a
wider audience due to the internet, social media and modern technology, which
is constantly growing. I believe campaigns will be catered towards the digital
side as this would make it easy to pass on a share with friends, family and
people across the world in an instant, and this is partly how Fairey’s artwork
has been so successful.
References:
Obey
Giant,. 'OBAMA'. N.p., 2015. Web. 25 Jan. 2015.
Obey
Giant,. 'Occupy HOPE V2- Revised'. N.p., 2015. Web. 26 Jan. 2015.
The
Huffington Post,. 'How The Obama "Hope" Poster Reached A Tipping
Point And Became A Cultural Phenomenon: An Interview With The Artist Shepard
Fairey'. N.p., 2015. Web. 25 Jan. 2015.
Wikipedia,.
'Gotham (Typeface)'. N.p., 2015. Web. 29 Jan. 2015.
Monday, 4 May 2015
OUGD401 | Poster Variations & Final
This is the final image I will use. I feel this is the most recognisable and easy to link to the original piece.
OUGD401 | Books
I've taken out two books to look at; 'Obey Giant' and 'Design for Obama'. The work in here will influence what I may or amy not do for my practical work.
I couldn't find 'Art for Obama' anywhere in the library so I will see if there is any content from that book available online.
OUGD401 | Final Tutorial Feedback
Tutorial with Richard went well, he seemed to like what I had in mind for my practical work and everything with my essay was looking good.
Essay:
-Get rid of the Charlie Hebdo section because it doesn't really fit in.
Try and replace it with one or two paragraphs from the Shepard Fairey books in the library and analysis what it has to say.
-More quotes from those books.
Books to look at:
-Design for Obama
-Obey Giant
-Art for Obama
-Obey: Supply and Demand
-Mayday: The Art of Shepard Fairey
Practical:
Use the Obama 'Hope' style to try and get young people to vote. This allows me to get first hand research to show it actually means something.
At first just do labour, and if it's simple to design do the rest and make it a set.
Play around with the colour.
OUGD401 | Practical Work Ideas
1. With the election coming up I thought it would be cool to do an Obama style poster for either just labour party or maybe do all of them as a set, depending how hard it is.
2. I don't support the 'Pirate Party UK' but I think their views on privacy and the UK's obsession with CCTV and watching people and their policies are the similar to that of Anonymous and The Occupy Movement, which could be interesting to look into.
3. No parties have anything to say about internet privacy so i could do a poster saying that it's an issue that people feel strongly about. Along with posters I could produce stickers to allow people to share their thoughts and feelings and support.
I don't know a whole lot about politics and don't follow it with a passion. So if I were to do something about politics and the general election, (which I think would be very fun) I would have to be sure it was exactly what i was trying to say so I don't look like an idiot.
To keep it more simple so I don't look like a fool, I could do an Obama 'Hope' style poster for just one or each of the parties. That way I don't show any personal views and it doesn't delve deeply into the policies, it's there to grab the attention of the viewers.
OUGD401 Study Task 3 | Summarising and Referencing
Hypothesis:
How important has the role of graphic design been in political and/or social movements over the past ten years?
A strong political campaign has proven to be a major factor in wining a campaign/election. I intend to explore how and why this may be, focusing on the past ten years.
OUGD401 Study Task 4 | Structuring Your Essay
The brief structure I came up with goes as followed:
Shepard Fairey's 'Hope' Poster
The Occupy Movement
The Guy Fawkes Mask
Charlie Hebdo
More specifically I intend to link these topics so the essay flows and makes sense to the reader.
Shepard Fairey's 'Hope' Poster
Altered for the 'Occupy Movement'
The Occupy Movement
How and why the poster was altered (The Guy Fawkes Mask)
The Guy Fawkes Mask
What it stands for and links to 'Anonymous' > What they stand for and how they helped the Charlie Hebdo movement
Charlie Hebdo
How social media/internet/modern technology helpes movements
Shepard Fairey's 'Hope' Poster
The Occupy Movement
The Guy Fawkes Mask
Charlie Hebdo
More specifically I intend to link these topics so the essay flows and makes sense to the reader.
Shepard Fairey's 'Hope' Poster
Altered for the 'Occupy Movement'
The Occupy Movement
How and why the poster was altered (The Guy Fawkes Mask)
The Guy Fawkes Mask
What it stands for and links to 'Anonymous' > What they stand for and how they helped the Charlie Hebdo movement
Charlie Hebdo
How social media/internet/modern technology helpes movements
OUGD401 | Essay Draft
Discuss the role that Graphic Design has played in political and/or social change in a specific period in history.
Graphic design has played a huge part in many political campaigns and social movements throughout the past. Whether it be big or small, graphic design and strong branding has become a fundamental role in winning a campaign or even winning a war. From party logos to the typeface used on campaign banners and from propaganda posters to union jack badges, it is important to get these things right in order to help gain support. When it comes to 'social change', it's hard to pin down exactly what this means or what exactly would qualify for graphic design. Picket signs that were made by protestors to be marched through the centre of town - are these pieces of graphic design? Graffiti on the side of a fast food chain commentating on the divide between rich and poor - is this graphic design? It is thanks to these blurred [restrictions/definitions/outlines?] of what is and isn't graphic design that can make this discussion so much more interesting as so many further topics can be discussed. Due to this, I want to explore graphic design's role in political and social change in the 21st century. I feel that the digital capabilities that have become available have greatly improved how people are able view design and how easily it can be shared. In addition to this, I also think some of the topics that have hit the news in recent years and events that have occurred will cause for an interesting discussion as the design response for some of them were extremely important.
One example of an extremely strong piece of political campaign design is Shepard Fairey's 'Hope' poster, which went on to represent Obama's 2008 official presidential campaign and is widely called a 'cultural phenomenon'. What started off as a personal project of his, Fairey screen-printed and sold 350 posters with the image straight after designing. Rather than taking the money for profit and stopping there, he used the money to produce more posters; selling them, putting them up around the city and eventually distributing them at Obama rallies once it became so iconic to Obama's campaign.
The non-profit principal of designing and designing for a purpose is one of the most effective and pure ways to design, especially when it comes to social or political change. Fairey clearly supported Obama and his ideas but was "naïve" about "Obama's popularity" (Fairey, 2011) as he thought Obama would "get crushed by the Clinton juggernaut" and therefor decided to use his own popularity within pop culture to give Obama extra exposure, without damaging Obama's campaign due to "street artists and radical types" (Fairey, 2011) trying to help him out. Although Fairey is a street artist and a pop culture icon thanks to the huge success of his work and 'Obey', he believed in what Obama said and felt passionately about what he wanted to see happen; because of this he decided to help, to inform and ultimately to persuade the general public. Fairey succeeded with his goals as the image went viral extremely quickly soon after he made the image available on his already popular website. The use of digital media here perfectly demonstrates how modern technology can help get work seen by millions of people. Fairey explained in an interview with Ben Arnon from 'The Huffington Post' that he felt the image did so well because it was the perfect way for Obama's followers to express their support in modern and symbolic way. Due to it being accessible online, people were able to share the image extremely easily, such as sharing it with their hundreds of Facebook friends or share it on the then-popular site MySpace. The image was easily accessible for the younger generation to relate to due to Fairey's previous work and his links to the popular brand 'Obey', so this generation would have most likely already seen this image on the internet before it went viral world wide. A study called Generations Online from 2009 showed that thirty percent of 18-32 year olds were active online (it has probably increased over recent years). Not only was it good for people to see online, but if people could print out their own copy of the poster, it adds to the cause, people could stick it wherever they wanted and still get more people to see it. The idea behind all of this was to keep the image moving round and round and it worked very well.
The image itself is a portrait of Barack Obama in a vector-style illustration with a red, white and blue colour scheme, very fitting for an American presidential campaign. The photograph the Fairey used as a reference point shows Obama looking at a fixed point in the distance to the right. The illustration's se of colour shows that half of his face is clearly highlighted, portraying that he is someone of great importance and is extremely wise it is almost biblical representation of a messiah. The other side of his face is cast in a deep shadow, shown through the colour red. The background of the poster is split in the same manner; blue on the left and red on the right. Along with these being two of the American flag colours, blue and red often symbolise hot and cold, peace and anger. In spite of this, Obama does not come across as an angry person and Fairey did not/does not know him well enough to know what he is like out of the public eye. In this case the red represents Obama's passion and love for America and its wellbeing. Whereas the blue represents Obama's calm side, his vision, his thoughts and his caring nature. At the time of the election there was a lot of excitement surrounding Obama's campaign as he had the chance to become America's first black president. It is important to note that Fairey's work doesn’t not show the colour of Obama's skin because it does not to as this idea supports Obama's policies and beliefs that everyone is equal.
In the first original first 300 posters the text at the bottom read 'Progress', but that then got changed when the campaign's PR wanted to push the message of 'Hope' The typeface used for this and the rest of Obama's campaign was 'Gotham', a sans serif font with a geometric essence to it. This is a suitable font as it was created in 2000 by Tobias Frere-Jones and took direct inspiration from New York City's culture and surroundings. Aside from Washington, New York could be called America's most important city due to the organisations based there and along with other responsibilities it holds and has been described as the cultural and financial capital of the world. So it makes sense that the typeface used should originate in such a patriotic and important city that has such strong links to design. Even after the campaign 'Gotham' got used for various federal government projects, the most notable being the identity of the 2010 United States Census. Another example is the cornerstone for the Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center site which was described as the then-Governor as the "bedrock" (Wikipedia, 2015) of New York. When used directly in the poster it works well as it doesn’t interfere with the portrait but is a clear part of the whole image and instantly recognisable; it's clear, bold and as Andrew Romano of Newsweek put it: "it's very American" (Wikipedia, 2015).
Overall the image was widely popular and extremely successful. Fairey was able to capture Barrack Obama perfectly in his illustration and it was done so well it made people want to show others and share it and the poster has now ben recognised as a cultural phenomenon. The online popularity of this poster caused many parodies and copies supporting or showing many different people or things to be made. In fact Shepard Fairey himself produced an adaption of the original poster in 2011 to support the 'occupy movement'.
For the poster 'Occupy Hope', Fairey replaced Barrack Obama with someone wearing a Guy Fawkes mask. The mask is a stylised portrayal of supposedly Guy Fawkes that has a wide smile, strong round cheeks with a moustache turned up at both ends accompanied by a thin vertical beard. The mask was designed by illustrator David Lloyd and was first seen on the front cover of the book 'V for Vendetta', which was adapted into a film in 2006. Since then the mask has become an international symbol for rebellion.
The Occupy Movement protests against social and economic inequalities around the world. All protests in the UK, America and many other countries have been peaceful, although some countries have had to use violence to be heard, so much so dictators have been overthrown. The Occupy Movement is getting more and more support everyday and the slogan 'We Are The 99%' is therefore getting heard more and more. This slogan is the focus point for all the movements campaign and all of its 'propaganda'. The 99% refers to the poor, against the top 1% of the rich. The slogan itself is very powerful. In five words it conveys power and togetherness for millions of people globally. What started as a 'Tumblr' post is now the slogan for an ever-growing international social movement.
Fairey's 'Occupy Hope' is the most notable piece of Graphic Design that supports the Occupy Movement. As mentioned earlier, the poster has an image of a person wearing a Guy Fawkes mask rather than Obama. The poster has the same vector-style illustration and the same colour scheme as the original. This is very effective due to the fact that the 'Hope' poster was/is so well recognised so anything designed in that is going to grab the viewer's attention. In addition to the mask, more text was added. At the bottom of the poster it reads 'Mister President, we hope you're on our side', using the original 'Hope' for extra impact. Although the added text is smaller, it does not go unnoticed as it is a red against a dark blue. Where as Gotham was used for the original text, the new text uses what looks to be a slab-serif typeface. This could be to draw more attention to it or because it comes across bolder than a plain serif. By using a slab-serif and talking directly to 'Mister President', it comes across very powerful and meaningful without sounding too threatening. As well as the text at the bottom, 'We are the 99%' was added to Obama's badge that sits above the 'E'. Although this works as a great way to be able to get the slogan in the poster without it looking out of place, it also implies that Obama is in fact on 'their side', which he is not.
Although this poster was liked among many and even those not interested or involved in the Occupy Movement, some of the people who are actually involved were not 100% happy with the design of it. A nameless organiser for The Occupy (Wall Street) Movement said that the organises "cannot in anyway be connected" (Organiser, 2011) to the adaptation. The reasoning behind this is that it would make them "hypocrites" (Organiser, 2011) as Obama has raised more money from Wall Street than any other candidate in history. To correct the situation the organiser mention earlier asked for Fairey to change a few aspects of the poster in order for it to fit the movement's goals and morals.
The altered version doesn’t have any major altercations. The only thing Fairey changed was the text that accompanied the iconic 'Hope' title. In the revisited version it says 'We are the Hope', this was a direct request from the organiser of the movement. They also requested for Fairey to add 'Expect us' underneath. This is a reference to Anonymous and their famous slogan; 'We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.' This is understandable as a "core subgroup within Anonymous played a significant role" in the evolution of the movement. For some reason Fairey chose not to include this despite the request, possible because it sounded too menacing for a peaceful protest, or the poster has more impact without the unneeded text.
The process this poster went though in extraordinary and very unique to the time we live in. The fact that an artist can create a piece of design to help a social movement and then for the organisers to request changes and give reason to the artist in order for it to be as strong as possible, all online is incredible. This was so easy to do as the modern age allows for work to be seen all over the world just hours after it has been created and for feedback to be given just as quickly. In this case it worked extremely well because there was a mutual respect between the two parties involved; Fairey supports The Occupy Movement and the movement respects Fairey's work and what he is doing for them. With no money involved it goes back to designing for a purpose, designing for what you believe in.
The Guy Fawkes mask that featured in the two versions of 'Occupy Hope' was first really made popular by Anonymous. It started in 2008 when Anonymous protested against the Church of Scientology and needed a way to hide their faces. As Anonymous is an internet-based group, they were able to easily plan how to do so, then, as more and more people began to protest for different things the mask became the main way people hid their identities while also showing their support for the group. It has now become associated with Anonymous so heavily that they base all of their own propaganda around it. They often make videos explaining what they are trying to achieve next. These videos open up with their logo; a headless figure wearing a suit with a question mark where the head should be. This clearly illustrates they do not want to be identified but also implies that it could be anyone behind the mask. This is backed up by the origin of the name 'Anonymous'. The name comes from a joke made by the users of '4Chan' a popular image and forum website. On here, when someone makes a post but does not want their name to be shown, it displays it as 'anonymous'. The joke was that there was just one person with the username 'anonymous' and they were making all of these posts. This then evolved to be the name of the group as it conveys the message that Anonymous is anyone and everyone and you don’t need to be seen to be heard. So with the suited, headless figure standing in front of a globe surrounded by a laurel wreath, it's clear to see they believe they are protecting the world. During the videos the person never shows their face, it's always covered by a Guy Fawkes mask along with a voice changer so it is impossible to identify who it is. All of this could be seen as graphic design as it is all part of their 'brand'. It has helped make certain movements more popular due to Anonymous' involvement and through their supporters. One of their recent videos explains their next challenge; 'Op Charlie Hebdo'.
'Op Charlie Hebdo' is in relation to the attacks on January 7th 2015, where twelve members of staff at Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical magazine, were murdered in their workplace by Islamist gunmen because they spoke out against certain beliefs. Anonymous then "declared war" (Anonymous, 2015) on Jihadists around the world by targeting Muslim extremist websites and publically exposing terrorists. Anonymous felt they had an obligation to do this as "freedom of speech was bruised" (Anonymous, 2015) and they have "always fought for the freedom of speech and freedom of press" (Anonymous, 2015). Anonymous took down many sites such as halal websites and replaced them with nothing but text that read; "Je suis Charlie. et je suis immortel". By having nothing but this text in the middle of the screen makes it extremely clear as to why it is there. No colour, no text, no confusion. The text 'Je suis Charlie' is done it two different sans serif fonts, both of which are very bold and strong, but 'Charlie' is actually taken from the Charlie Hebdo logotype. Underneath, 'et je suius immortel' has been done using a comic style script typeface. This is due to Charlie Hebdo being recognised for its cartoons and sadly the it's also the reason for the attacks. Also, by using a script font it makes it seem as if it has just been written. For example, 'Je suis Charlie' is the main slogan, but adding the extra bit underneath using a script is like the person has just written it for added effect and it really works, it makes it more personal.
The term 'Je suis Charlie' became the slogan adopted by supporters after the shootings. The standard layout of this phrase has the 'Je suis' at the top in a modern sans-serif, then underneath it says 'Charlie' taken from the logotype. This layout and these words are now instantly recognisable and are very powerful due to the meaning behind them, thanks to the exposure they got at rallies and gatherings, where people were able to print out their own copy to show their support.
There were responses to the tragedy from artists and designers worldwide, they were able to pay their respects in a way that was mutually appreciated by both sides; art. Where as a lot of the responses could have just been incredibly sad and serious, most of them were able to inject some humour and life into them, while still being respectful to the dead. Often, the message that was being said the strongest, is how the attacks made everyone stronger. One cartoon that really captured the hearts of many was by illustrator Lucille Clerc. The image shows three pencils, the top one titled 'Yesterday' was a full unbroken pencil, the middle one titled 'Today' shows the pencil snapped in two halves and the final bottom one shows 'Tomorrow' and the two halves have been sharpened to create two pencils. This drawing is incredibly clever and promotes strength and support. People wanted to share this image on sites like Instagram and Twitter because it was done so well; it was easy for people to instantly grasp the message but meaningful enough for it to be suitable to the events that occurred.
[conclusion]
References:
BEN ARNON / HUFFINGTON POST 2011. - How the Obama "Hope" Poster Reached a Tipping Point and Became a Cultural Phenomenon: An Interview With the Artist Shepard Fairey - [Online] Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-arnon/how-the-obama-hope-poster_b_133874.html [Accessed: 25th January 2015]
WIKIPEDIA 2015 - Gotham (Typeface) - [Online] Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_%28typeface%29 [Accessed: 29th January 2015]
OBEY GIANT 2015 - Occupy Hope V2 - Revised [Online] Available from: http://www.obeygiant.com/headlines/occupy-hope-v2 [Accessed: 1st February 2015]
YOUTUBE 2015 - Anonymous - #OpCharlieHebdo [Online] Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqbwqmb8P00 [Accessed: 4th February 2015]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)